This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Showing posts with label Freedom of speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freedom of speech. Show all posts

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Bradley Manning headed to prison, those who authorized torture go free


Former secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld shares a laugh with former president George W. Bush and former vice president Dick Cheney during his farewell parade at the Pentagon.

By: Matt Sledge, The Huffington Post
Source: Press TV

Bradley Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison on Wednesday for releasing 700,000 documents about the United States' worldwide diplomacy and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Manning was a 25-year-old Army private first class at the time of his arrest. He saw himself as an idealist acting to end the wars, and said in online chats with hacker Adrian Lamo that he was particularly concerned about the abuse of detainees in Iraq. No political or military higher-ups have ever been prosecuted for detainee abuse or torture in Iraq, Afghanistan or at Guantanamo Bay.

"One of the serious problems with Manning's case is that it sets a chilling precedent, that people who leak information ... can be prosecuted this aggressively as a deterrent to that conduct," said Andrea Prasow, senior counterterrorism counsel and advocate in Human Rights Watch's U.S. Program. "Shouldn't we be deterring people who commit torture?"

Here are some of the individuals who have been involved since 9/11 in detainee abuse and torture, and potential war crimes, and have never been prosecuted.

George W. Bush

George W. Bush was president when the U.S. invaded Iraq based on faulty intelligence, tortured terror prisoners and conducted extraordinary renditions around the world.

"Enhanced interrogation," a Bush administration euphemism for torture, was approved at the highest level. A "principals committee" composed of Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, CIA Director George Tenet and Attorney General John Ashcroft signed off on the methods.

"There are solid grounds to investigate Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Tenet for authorizing torture and war crimes," said Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, when the group released a report called "Getting Away With Torture" in 2011.

Dick Cheney

As Bush's vice president, Cheney pushed the nation over to the "dark side," as he called it, in the war on terror.

The U.S. used extraordinary renditions to swoop up terror suspects and send them to repressive regimes for torture. Cheney was the key driver in producing the faulty intelligence that led the U.S. into war in Iraq. And he steadfastly defended the CIA's use of water-boarding and other torture tactics on U.S. prisoners.

Cheney "fears being tried as a war criminal," according to Colin Powell's former chief of staff Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, but he never has been.

Donald Rumsfeld

One of the planners of the Iraq War, Rumsfeld steadfastly maintained while Defense Secretary under Bush that U.S. soldiers did not have an obligation to stop torture being used by their Iraqi counterparts. He also approved of "stripping prisoners naked, hooding them, exposing prisoners to extremes of heat and cold, and slamming them up against walls" at Guantanamo.

While deployed to Iraq, Manning discovered that Iraqi soldiers had arrested members of a political group for producing a pamphlet called "Where Did the Money Go?" decrying corruption in the cabinet of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

"‘I immediately took that information and *ran* to the officer to explain what was going on," Manning wrote in the chat logs. "He didn’t want to hear any of it … he told me to shut up and explain how we could assist the FPs in finding *MORE* detainees."

George Tenet and CIA torturers

Tenet was the CIA chief who told Bush that the case for war with Iraq was a "slam dunk." Under his watch, the CIA waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri.

Further down the chain of command at the spy agency, lower-level officers have escaped prosecution for killing a prisoner in Iraq and one in Afghanistan in CIA custody. Attorney General Eric Holder in 2012 ruled out prosecuting anyone responsible for those deaths.

In sharp contrast, former CIA agent John Kiriakou is currently serving a 30-month sentence for revealing to reporters the names of interrogators involved in detainee abuse.

Abu Ghraib higher-ups

Although low-level soldiers like former Army Reserve Specialist Lynndie England were court-martialed for their role in detainee abuse at this notorious prison in Iraq, graphically illustrated in photos, the only officer prosecuted in the case had his conviction tossed out.

A 2009 Senate Armed Services Committee report found that the abuses at Abu Ghraib were not the result of a few unmonitored bad apples but rather the direct result of "enhanced interrogation" practices approved of by officials much higher up in the Bush administration.
-----------------------
Update: 11:55 am
 

Bradley Manning In His Own Words After Being Sentenced to 35 Years

Video Source: The Real News
 
Manning's attorney David Coombs reads American Hero Bradley Manning's statement after he is imprisoned for 35 years in a Military Prison.

 

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Bradley Manning sentenced to 35 years in prison

 
 
US Army Private First Class Bradley Manning arrives alongside military officials at a US military court facility to hear his sentence in his trial at Fort Meade, Maryland on August 21, 2013. (AFP Photo / Saul Loeb)

Source: Russia Today

A US military judge has sentenced Army Pfc. Bradley Manning to 35 years in prison. Manning faced up to 90 years behind bars, while prosecutors sought to put the whistleblower away for a minimum of six decades.

Manning will be credited with the 1,294 days he spent in pre-trial confinement plus an additional 112 days. He was also dishonorably discharged, saw his rank reduced to private from private first class and was forced to forfeit all pay and benefits. No additional fine, however, was levied against him. Manning will have to serve a third of his sentence before he is eligible for parole.

Col. Denise Lind, who on Tuesday began her deliberations in the court-martial case, announced the sentence shortly after 10am local time (14:00 GMT). Lind read out the sentence succinctly and provided no other statement as a gaggle of journalist’s waited in anticipation. Flanked by his lawyers, Manning, 25, stood at attention and appeared not to react when Lind announced the punishment, AP reports. He further made no statement after his fate was announced

Immediately after sentencing, Amnesty International called on President Barack Obama to commute Manning’s sentence to time already served to allow his immediate release.

"Instead of fighting tooth and nail to lock him up for decades, the US government should turn its attention to investigating and delivering justice for the serious human rights abuses committed by its officials in the name of countering terror,” said Widney Brown, Senior Director of International Law and Policy at Amnesty International.

The American Civil Liberties Union was also quick to excoriate the decision.
“When a soldier who shared information with the press and public is punished far more harshly than others who tortured prisoners and killed civilians, something is seriously wrong with our justice system,” said Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project.

Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, decried the sentence as "unprecedented"in its magnitude.

"It's more than 17 times the next longest sentence ever served" for providing secret material to the media, said Goitein. "It is in line with sentences for paid espionage for the enemy."

Manning's lawyer David E. Coombs had asked the judge for leniency, requesting a sentence that did not “rob him of his youth." Coombs argued that Manning's leaks had not endangered the US.

The prosecution had sought a 60-year sentence, arguing the stiff term would deter others from leaking classified information.

"There's value in deterrence," prosecutor Capt. Joe Morrow said in his closing argument on Monday

 
Protesters with the Bradley Manning Support Network hold a vigil while waiting to hear Manning's sentence on August 21, 2013 outside the gate of Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. (AFP Photo / T.J. Kirkpatrick)

Last week the 25-year-old Manning apologized for the “unintended consequences”of his actions, saying he believed he was “going to help people, not hurt people."

He told the court at Fort Meade, Maryland, that "the last three years have been a learning experience for me."

WikiLeaks responded to Manning’s mea culpa, saying “the only currency this military court will take is Bradley Manning’s humiliation.” The anti-secrecy group continued that Manning’s “forced” apology was done in the hopes of “shaving a decade or more off his sentence.”

The soldier was convicted last month of 20 charges including espionage, theft and violating computer regulations. Manning was found not guilty, however, of the most serious charge – aiding the enemy – which entailed a potential sentence of life without the possibility of parole.

Manning faced up to 90 years in prison for passing on more than 700,000 Iraq and Afghanistan battlefield reports and State Department diplomatic cables to WikiLeaks while working as an intelligence analyst in Iraq in 2010. He was later arrested in Iraq in May of that year.

He also leaked video of ‘Collateral Murder’ video, which shows a US helicopter attack in Baghdad in which at least nine non-combatants were killed, including a Reuters news photographer and his driver.

Manning is entitled to appeal against any verdict handed to him by the court-martial in the Army Court of Criminal Appeal within six months
.

Collateral Murder Bradley Manning Leaked Video Clip



Video Source:
 

Manning's sentence unjustifiably harsh, crimes he exposed remain unpunished – Moscow

Source: Russia Today
Moscow has slammed the “harsh” sentence for US Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, saying it was apparently meant to scare away other whistleblowers, and was not in accordance with human rights standards.
When the USA’s interests are at stake, the American judicial system, as in the case of Bradley Manning, takes unjustifiably harsh decisions based on the principle of 'let’s teach them so that it doesn’t become a habit' – and without any glance at the human rights aspects,” Russian Foreign Ministry’s special representative for human rights, Konstantin Dolgov told reporters on Wednesday.
Calling Manning’s case an example of US “double standards in regard with the supremacy of law and human rights,” Dolgov argued it showed that America’s claims for leadership in those respects are “groundless.”
The Foreign Ministry official then cited international human rights groups – including those in based in the US – who believe Manning has revealed “widespread abuses on the part of the US Army during operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, including the deaths of civilian, the torture of prisoners, as well as the other grave abuses of the international human rights law. ”
Despite all the efforts of rights groups and the UN Human Rights Council, no one in the US was held accountable for these crimes, Dolgov added
----------------------------------------------------

FREE Bradley Manning!!! Jail US Military for War Crimes in Iraq and US Government for their Aggressive war on the sovereign nation of Iraq!

 
 
 

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

The Rise of Global Fascism and the Road to World War III




Video Source: Russia Today
Govts threats to journos 'signalling rise of fascism' - WikiLeaks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_IsThRX3JI

I made a video series 2 years ago called “The Road to Endless War” to bring attention to the trends and path that the World was heading towards. In episode 7 titled “Empires Fall & New Ones Rise” I point out what is coming in regards to freedom of the Press and its suppression – Today we are seeing a global fascist empire rising before us as the establishment of this economic system are now censoring news stations, vilifying reporters, declaring them enemies, and in some cases killing them. (See video and story Links at the Bottom of this Post for more details and Information)



Video Source: World United News
Road to Endless War - The Final Chapter - (Part 7) - Empires Fall & New Ones Rise
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdW2Onmchn8

We are now at the cusp of what comes next which in my opinion is a major staged event (False Flag Event) the results of which will see the emerging fascist state criminalize all opposing voices, the complete erosion of our freedoms and privacy, and a push for a major war.

The direction our Western Fascist Empire is taking ensures their own agenda of total economic control, which can only be done by destroying all opposition to it at any cost. The result of a staged event will bring war to western shores, collapse of the western economic system, and the destruction of our freedoms and liberties, which includes a great deal of pain and suffering. One can easily guess which group of people have been demonized by our Israeli and Saudi controlled nations, and where all the wars our governments started are raging…

I’ve warned everyone, now it’s up to you to make a choice, either follow the establishment and repeat history on a scale 1 million times worse than World War II, or organize and rise up within your own countries to fight back…

People need to refuse to comply with their governments, and must speak out in their masses or there will be no safety for anyone…the Psychopathic establishment are ready to play their last hand in a game that is rigged and stacked in their favour…their final hand is a full house with terrorism, war, collapse, torture and death. We must answer with massive rebellion. The system of governance must be removed from the hands of the few and be placed in the hands of the many.



Video Source: World United News
Road to Endless War - (Part 9) - Conflict, Collapse & Solutions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gedGEoiuPyw

---------------------

In the Video below: The Guardian's editor Alan Rusbridger said that UK authorities raided the paper's London office to destroy hard drives in a bid to stop further damaging publications. He also said that intelligence officials from the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) had told him that he had the option of handing over all the classified documents or seeing the newspaper's hard drives destroyed. For more RT talks to WikiLeaks spokesperson, Kristinn Hrafnsson.


UK orders Guardian hard drives destroyed to gag Snowden leaks




Video Source: Russia Today
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MneAXGkZnX0

---------------------------------

Important View Points & Video Links:

Govts threats to journos 'signalling rise of fascism' - WikiLeaks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_IsThRX3JI
UK orders Guardian hard drives destroyed to gag Snowden leaks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MneAXGkZnX0
YouTube bans Press TV's new page
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/08/20/319607/youtube-attacks-press-tv-again/
Israeli ADL Orders YouTube to Disable Press TV
http://worldunitednews.blogspot.ca/2013/08/adl-orders-youtube-to-disable-press-tv.html
Iranian Press TV Removed From Britain - George Galloway Blasts OFCOM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okdGX4JjFyY
Silencing Press TV part of pre-war plan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9twrl-t5Vo
Eutelsat moves to take Iran's Al-Alam off air
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BhxNEGi1UE

Hedges: Journalism Should Be About Truth, Not Career
http://youtu.be/XR0oGJ2yrmc
Bradley Manning, the Nuremberg Charter and Refusing to Collaborate with War Crimes
http://youtu.be/VOmwdjcK0nQ
International Law and "The Responsibility to Protect"
http://youtu.be/ywYIL1ZYmjU
URGENT: Investigate Michael Hastings' Death
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EysdTBx-ShI
The Mysterious Death of Reporter Michael Hastings
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwE9eBn3LMs
Collateral Murder Bradley Manning Leaked Video Clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0I6S8mva-s
Bradley Manning Heads for Trial; No One Charged for Murdered Civilians
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOIPGRUL1CU
Edward Snowden Full Interview : NSA Whistleblower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ialFanzFI0Q
Assange on NSA leak: Snowden will be prosecuted for years
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=touD05P6ZD4
Whistleblower in Hacking Scandal Found Dead
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BucD4hjxo5A
Whistleblower's Death: James Corbett on Murdoch scandal turning bloody
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nOOKIVufas
Aaron was killed by the government - Robert Swartz on his son's Death
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yKkk-cUk6c
Milton William "Bill" Cooper predicts 9/11 and MORE on June 28 2001
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMlE6aiDFfY
Road to Endless War - The Final Chapter - (Part 7) - Empires Fall & New Ones Rise
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdW2Onmchn8
Road to Endless War (Full Series)
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF0ED5173C2F2C94E

 

Sunday, August 18, 2013

ADL orders YouTube to disable Press TV account: Emadi


Source: Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/08/18/319340/youtube-bans-press-tv-upon-adl-order/

Video-sharing site YouTube deactivated Press TV's official page without explanation after the Israeli-American Anti-Defamation League (ADL) ordered it to terminate the Iranian channel's live broadcast.

"We have not been able to upload new videos on our official YouTube page since July 25. Both YouTube and (its parent company) Google have declined to comment," said Press TV Newsroom Director Hamid Reza Emadi.

He added that YouTube was "in fact responding to an ADL order to stop us from revealing Israeli crimes to the world."

An article on ADL's official website has accused Press TV of bypassing the West's sanctions by broadcasting live via YouTube and other internet and mobile platforms.

"ADL has contacted YouTube regarding concerns about Press TV," reads the article, further noting that the station's "broadcast on YouTube comes at a time when the United States, the European Union and others in the international community are seeking to isolate Iran."

Since January 2012, Press TV has come under mounting pressure from European governments and satellite companies, which have taken the alternative channel off the air across the European Union.

In a statement published on the official website of the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the pro-Israeli lobby has lauded Spain's efforts to ban Press TV, saying Madrid has pulled the plug on the Iranian channel following months of negotiations with the AJC.

"In recent years has emerged a channel that not only challenges the Zionists' long-time media dominance, but also has it questioned the West's silence on their (the Zionists') crimes against humanity. That's Press TV and they're determined to silence it," Emadi added.

He said Press TV had to create an alternative YouTube account to upload its videos.

"Viewers can now watch our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/PresstvNewsCast/

," he said

 

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Obama secretly signs the most aggressive cybersecurity directive ever


 
Reuters/Rick Wilking

Source: Russia Today
http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-directive-20-cyber-715/

Six years after the White House first started running amok on the computer networks of its adversaries, US President Barack Obama has signed off on a top-secret order that finally offers blueprints for the Pentagon’s cyberwars.

Pres. Obama has autographed an executive order outlining protocol and procedures for the US military to take in the name of preventing cyberattacks from foreign countries, the Washington Post reports, once and for all providing instructions from the Oval Office on how to manage the hush-hush assaults against opposing nation-states that have all been confirmed by the White House while at the same time defending America from any possible harm from abroad.

According to Post’s sources, namely “officials who have seen the classified document and are not authorized to speak on the record,” Pres. Obama signed the paperwork in mid-October. Those authorities explain to the paper that the initiative in question, Presidential Policy Directive 20, “establishes a broad and strict set of standards to guide the operations of federal agencies in confronting threats in cyberspace.”

Confronting a threat may sound harmless, but begs to introduce a chicken-and-the-egg scenario that could have some very serious implications. The Post describes the directive as being “the most extensive White House effort to date to wrestle with what constitutes an ‘offensive’ and a ‘defensive’ action in the rapidly evolving world of cyberwar and cyberterrorism,” but the ambiguous order may very well allow the US to continue assaulting the networks of other nations, now with a given go-ahead from the commander-in-chief. Next in line, the Post says, will be rules of engagement straight from the Pentagon that will provide guidelines for when to carry out assaults outside the realm of what is considered ‘American’ in terms of cyberspace.

“What it does, really for the first time, is it explicitly talks about how we will use cyber operations,” one senior administration official tells the paper of the policy directive. “Network defense is what you’re doing inside your own networks. . . . Cyber operations is stuff outside that space, and recognizing that you could be doing that for what might be called defensive purposes.”

When The New York Times published an exposé on the White House’s so-called Olympics Games program earlier this year, the world became fully aware for once of America’s involvement in international cyberwar, but much to the chagrin of Washington. Officials including members of Pres. Obama’s national security team spoke on condition of anonymity to tell the Times that his predecessor, then-Pres. George W. Bush, began the program in 2006 to target Iran’s nuclear facilities and then passed it along to the current administration to continue under the leadership of the current commander-in-chief.

“From his first months in office,” David Sanger wrote for the Times, Pres. Obama “secretly ordered increasingly sophisticated attacks on the computer systems that run Iran’s main nuclear enrichment facilities, significantly expanding America’s first sustained use of cyberweapons.”

Congress has fought tooth-and-nail in the months since to plug any leaks that could potentially spill the beans regarding any further secrets with the potential of effecting national security, but those efforts appear unsuccessful given this week’s Post report on Presidential Police Directive 20.

Now take the example of Iran: according to the Post, Pres. Obama’s signature on last month’s directive means the US now has rules and regulations when it comes to protecting its own infrastructure from cyberattack, and can do so by means of launching what appear to be pre-emptive assaults of their own.

“It should enable people to arrive at more effective decisions,” a second senior administration official tells the Post. “In that sense, it’s an enormous step forward.”

That comment echoes US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s insistence earlier this year that “defense alone is not enough” in terms of keeping the country safe. But what it also seems to do is put on the books a presidential policy that equates an overzealous offense with a solid defense. While the US has cited Iranian hackers as the key players behind a recent attack on the websites of Capital One Financial Corp. and BB&T Corp., two of the biggest names in the American banking industry, the US has done little — on the record — to reveal any similar assaults from abroad. Instead, rather, it’s relied on fear-mongering to try and convince the country to accept a cybersecurity legislation that will assure American’s safety from foreign hackers, all for the small price of sacrificing their digital-age privacy.

While the Obama White House has failed to acknowledge the Olympic Games program or any involvement in the Stuxnet or Flames viruses linked to the initiative, computer researchers in both the US and Russia have tied Washington to the cripplingly malicious coding. Earlier this month, California-based Chevron, one of the world’s leaders in the oil sector, went public with claims that Stuxnet had infected — but not affected — their computers after the virus was unleashed.

The ability to slow down or speed up centrifuges in nuclear facilities from thousands of miles away made Stuxnet a virus that had very substantial powers. Refusing to speak of the Olympic Games program specifically, former CIA chief Michael Hayden told the Times, “This is the first attack of a major nature in which a cyberattack was used to effect physical destruction.”

According to the Post’s latest, though, future assaults by way of Stuxnet or similar worms could be considered by Washington as defense mechanisms to make sure Iran doesn’t retaliate for what America has long-been lashing out with. One source tells the Times that, before last month’s directive, severing any link between a US-computer and an overseas server by any means possible would be an act that would put America on the offensive. Now even a preemptive attack that disconnects other countries could be considered a defensive ploy according to the president.

“That was seen as something that was aggressive…particularly by some at the State Department,” one defense official tells the Post. With the signing of Pres. Obama’s latest order, though, the paper writes that the directive “effectively enables the military to act more aggressively to thwart cyberattacks on the nation’s web of government and private computer networks.”

It is thought that, through the directive, any systems linked even remotely with America’s can be fair game for an assault. Given the expansion of cloud computing and the ever-expanding interconnection of communities across the globe on the Web, though, that could essentially enable Uncle Sam’s cybersquad to get away with a whole new slew of tricks to try and topple adversaries of any kind that threaten the American way of life. When and where those actions are necessary, of course, remains another topic of discussion. Will those orders be signed in secrecy as well, though?

 

Friday, November 9, 2012

The Music Industry and the Awakening Global Consciousness



By: Stewart Brennan
World United Music
http://worldunitedmusic.blogspot.com/
World United News
http://worldunitednews.blogspot.com/

Shortly after the Second World War ended, a great euphoria captured the imagination of a generation and expressed how it felt to be free of war, oppression, and economic depression. Rock & Roll was born and with it, came the “The Recording Industry” which would capture the hopes, dreams, and aspirations, of millions.

Virtually overnight, “Records” had supplanted “Sheet Music” as the largest player in the music business. Rock and Roll bands became hugely popular as they began to emerge and make their way in front of millions of adoring fans via the ever expanding radio airwaves and the new broadcast format called television.

Rock n Roll music carried the voice and energy of an entire generation with a popularity that grew exponentially during the baby boom years after World War II. The planet was alive in vibrant energy with a euphoria that put happiness back into the steps of the masses. But it also put fear into those that were considered the establishment of the time.

Rock and Roll had a nemesis with envious eyes that was appalled by the rising power within the new emerging music scene. Lurking in the dark places behind international power politics was an establishment fresh off a military conquest, and they did not like the empowerment music had on the youth. The new music embraced by a youthful generation filled with energy, determination, and a new self confidence, rocked the very foundations of the establishment. 

First Attempts to Silence a Generation

The earliest rock stars of the 50’s experienced a series of attacks through a concerted effort by the establishment to defame the emerging stars from their fans by a number of mean spirited attacks.

By 1959, the death of Buddy Holly, The Big Bopper, and Ritchie Valens, plus the manditory military service for Elvis Presley, the prosecution of Jerry Lee Lewis and Chuck Berry, the infamous Payola Scandal and the retirement of Little Richard proved that the power behind the scenes was not ammused with the new Rock n Roll era and was decidedly against the powerful messages that it brought.

What followed was an assault on the music, where some suggest a “Feminisation” of Rock n Roll took place seen by the flood of love ballads at the start of the 1960s being aimed at the female audience.

However, the voice within the music industry was not controlled as Rock n Roll evolved with innovative developments and ways that built on rock and roll, including multitrack recording, developed by Les Paul, the electronic treatment of sound by innovators such as Joe Meek, the Wall of Sound productions of Phil Spector, and the rise of surf music, garage rock and the Twist dance craze.

There were many different streams of music that evolved directly from Rock n Roll, but there was also a fusion of genres that would feed the growing appetites of an expanding  population. From the mid-1960s on through to the mid 1980s, "rock n roll" music evolved into many genres that gave voice to the attitude and political thoughts of the people. As the recording Industry evolved, so too did the form of rebellion against the direction and drive of the political establishment.

Folk music gave rise to a youthful and very political anti-war voice that carried its weight by unifying millions of people across North America and Europe through clever ballads.

Protest music would become a battlefront for an establishment that now had a new and powerful political opponent at home. Radio airwaves across North America and Europe carried protest music that expressed dissatisfaction against the establishments warlike stance and economic stranglehold on the World.

The harder the establishment came down on political activism or anti-war demonstrations, the more topics created within the lyrics of the next album of songs by all who witnessed. It had the affect of strengthening the resolve of the people which made the music more popular and more political. The establishment found that they could not silence the voice against them short of controlling the airwaves of the music and news mediums.

Decisions Made to Control the Entire Recording Industry

Back in the 1960’s and 1970’s there were a great many record labels that an artist could approach to sell their talents. If one label did not like the tone of the music or the musician, the artist could simply shop his / her music to the record company down the street. Radio stations back then were local and expressed the issues and attitudes of the people within the broadcast signal, so there was no concerted control over what was played and what was not.  

Freedom of expression within the Music industry carried over the television and radio airwaves and became the single most important reason why the United States Government pulled out of Viet Nam in the mid 1970’s.

It was a battle that ended in victory for the people over a warring establishment. The victory struck a huge blow to the establishment’s control over the population but it was certainly not the end of the war for control over the population by the establishment.

Before the Music Industry Collusion

Before CD technology changed the direction of the music industry, there were hundreds, of small record labels eager to go into partnership with artists, but more importantly, the smaller label also had access to the radio airwaves. In reality, the small labels were directly responsible for the variety of musical content carried by the radio stations. The Radio content was also expressed by many different DJ’s through personalized radio programs that catered to specific audiences. Radio music shows had a great appeal to the public because the DJ’s had freedom to play whatever they wanted while crossing a wide variety of topics.

However, the establishment did not embrace free speech since peace, anti-war, and anti-establishment were the topics in many popular shows and songs that drove straight at the power structure. Free speech in music went against the status quo and considering that public opinion, through news and music, forced the military congressional complex out of Viet Nam in the mid 70’s, they grew more determined to silence free speech…short of declaring marshal law.

If a military industrial congressional complex was to ever sell another war to the American people, they needed to take control of all forms of communication, news and entertainment.

The Establishment Strikes Back

Control by the powerful few in the music industry happened when the largest record labels owned by the establishments entertainment industry circles, went into collusion in 1985. The American news industry was already going through a take over by large corporate interests including the creation of an all day news channel called CNN. The music industry was no different as several record labels had been aquired by large entertainment industry interests with big pockets.

Six major record labels “jointly announced” that they were adopting CD technology within a six month period following the announcement. They stated that they would no longer produce vinyl records and only produce CD’s and 4 track cassette tapes. The big six recording companies “Warner”, “Universal”, “EMI”, “BMG”, “Sony”, and “Polygram” used CD technology, to corner the market and destroy all the smaller labels that could not compete with a very new and expensive technology created by “Philips”.

The next move by the establishment was to take control of the radio airwaves and block the smaller labels from gaining access to radio promotion. They did this by quickly buying up radio stations all over North America, placing them in syndication and implementing a top 40 format that played only what the six major labels offered.

The slaughter was on and endless amounts of capital was directed at controlling the music end of the entertainment Industry, although the same thing was happening in the “News” Industry and by the same conglomerates.

CD’s, and radio syndication provided the answers of control that these C.F.R. (Council on Foreign Relations) Entertainment Industry Corporations needed. Human rights and public opinion are generally reflected through music, so controlling the art form was certainly a decision made in the highest of circles.

Freedom of Speech Regained:

A long silence (1986 ~ 2000) ensued once control was established in the music Industry. Most music from the past was not pressed into CD’s and most everything that the Major Record Labels offered after 1986 was pre-packaged and controlled. Everything out of mainstream music was contained in three genres, “Lude, Crude, and Rude”.


Most of what came out of the Controlled Industry was extremely negative. However, in all fairness there were many artists that truly made good music, but they were few and far between, unlike the pre-collusion years in music.

The Establishment had gained control of all aspects within the entertainment Industry but especially in News and Music. The test of their industry conquests would come in 1991 when the establishment was able to get a 90% approval rating for going to war against Saddam Hussain and Iraq. They controlled all paths of information including television, radio and newsprint. Anti War movements could not arise because the establishment was successful in silencing anti-war voices from being heard by the general public.

However, the establishment did not anticipate that technology would get the upper hand on them in the late 1990’s, especially with the combination of the computer, the Internet, file sharing, and websites like Napster.

Napster brought the music and a political voice back to the masses who’d been cut off from music variety and real news for about 15 years. Technology allowed the music contained on old Vinyl records to be digitized onto the computer via mp3 format. This practice became hugely popular because the music that had not been made available on CD by the big record labels was not only being digitized by music fans but was being burned into CD’s on home computers.

Suddenly the technology to make CD’s was available on the home computer. The very compact mp3 format made sharing music by email a unique thing until a Napster came along and provided a place for music fans to share the files they had with each other.

The sharing aspect of Napster sparked great interest by many, especially by those who were new to the old music; but most importantly, Napster gave rise to the “International Social Network” where chatrooms became HUGE information sharing hubs that sparked the beginning of the truth movement. People begun to find out just what the new unipolar World Order was up to.

The Music Industry immediately condemned file sharing and went after all the music sharing websites that sprung up shortly after Napsters arrival. The effect Napster had on sharing old music across the World on a social platform was like uncorking a bottle of champaign, unmuting the sound from old records and letting the voices out of the bottle to a new generation.

Most of the music shared wasn’t even available on CD until mp3 and computer technology allowed people to make their own CD’s; much like the Cassette allowed us to put our own favourite hits together or tape shows from the radio in the 1970’s and 1980’s…all perfectly legal back in their day.

The establishment lost the power to control information. The genie was out of the bottle and there was no way they could put it back in.

People started to communicate with each other on a Global basis and found out that what they were led to believe on a number of topics or what they were told went on in other countries by their corporate news networks was in fact complete BS. The ensuing revelations began a quest for knowledge and information, including the need to be in a social environment with others that fostered open communication, information and shared entertainment.

After Napster was handcuffed, the enlightened Chatroom groups from Napster moved to other websites and social networking exploded across the Internet through sites like MSN, and Yahoo. The timing was very critical too considering that Napster made huge impacts on people around the World in 2000 and 2001, right when a US election was stolen and 911 happened.

Genie out of the Bottle

Afterwards, wherever the public gathered to communicate, download music, or share information, the establishment unleashed their corporate power and money to try and stop the evolving social forums. However, the quest for music, freedom and truth continued to evolved as other websites began making their way onto the Internet as previous ones were bought out or shut down by a corporate oligarchy bent on re-corking the bottle.

As the quest for truth expanded, YouTube was born (2005 – 2006) and became a huge kick in the teeth to the upper echelons of power because now the control and direction of the entertainment industry was completely smashed wide open. All of a sudden, information, video creation, alternative news and Independent music had a platform in the public eye and it was in the hands of the people for the first time. Truth seeking mushroomed into a movement, and now, even though YouTube was taken over by Google, Facebook has become a police state tool of unwarranted spying by the establishment, or that Twitter has been taken over by corporate interests, the voice of the people, music, and information have evolved into a new age.

Today, in 2012, our personal freedoms are still constantly under attack by the corporate establishment regarding freedom of speech and social evolution on the Internet, but resistance continues to grow, and evolve and it is a global movement.

Alternative News media has exploded across the web. There is a new age unfolding where freedom of speech has returned with truth and investigative reporting. Mainstream News corporations are dying as more and more people are choosing to switch off their televisions and get their information online with alternative news websites.

Music has evolved away from what was once totally dominated by the major record labels. The emergence of Independent artists, Independent labels, and Internet radio stations have grown exponentially and begun to forge the future of the music industry. The major labels are no longer required and have long since become redundant. Music is once again filled with the political voices of resistance and individuality, variety in music has returned, social networking and internet radio have become the new promotional tools for music replacing the AM and FM radio airwaves. Online digital music stores are replacing physical corporate music stores…costs are no longer an issue and freedom of speech can once again be heard in the many voices singing socially appealing music.

It will take some time to rebuild the music Industry to its former glory, however the road to get there is very bright indeed.  

"The Revolution begins with Music!" ~ Stewart Brennan
 

 
World United Music
http://worldunitedmusic.blogspot.com/
World United News
http://worldunitednews.blogspot.com/

Back up Links:

Rock n Roll - Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_n_Roll
List of Record Labels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_record_labels
The Establishments definition of the Music Industry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_industry
The Record Label
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Record_label
Radio Syndication
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_syndication

The Council on Foreign Relations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations
Council on Foreign Relations Corporate Members
http://www.cfr.org/content/about/annual_report/ar_2006/11_corporate_044-047.pdf
Napster
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napster

Monday, October 29, 2012

Canadian police urge Parliament to pass domestic spying bill


 
(AFP Photo / Patrick Kovarik)

Source: Russia Today
http://rt.com/news/canada-police-spy-bill-c-30-455/

Police across Canada are urging Ottawa to resurrect a controversial Internet surveillance bill that would allow them to monitor Canadians' digital activities in real-time without a warrant.

­The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police has made a plea to on the federal government to pass Bill C-30, also known as the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act ahead of a gathering by the provincial and federal justice ministers next week.

The group is concerned that Parliament will be closed down before the legislation is passed.

“We have a fear that it will die on the order paper,” said Vancouver Police Chief Jim Chu, who is also the president of the association. “And if it does, then our investigators will be constrained and victims will suffer greater harm because of that,” the Canadian Press reports.

Deputy police chief Warren Lemcke agreed with Chu’s assessment, saying that “right now there are gangsters out there communicating about killing someone and we can't intercept that,” as cited by CBC news.

The legislature, introduced in the Canadian Parliament last February, demands that the country’s telecommunication industry provide law enforcement with the “authority to intercept communications and to require telecommunications service providers to provide subscriber and other information, without unreasonably impairing the privacy of individuals, the provision of telecommunications services to Canadians or the competitiveness of the Canadian telecommunications industry.”

If passed, the law would also give the police the power to make it a crime to use social media as a tool to injure, alarm or harass individuals. It would also grant access to the individual’s private data such as name, address, phone number and email without a warrant.

The law would ask the companies to place tracking bugs in their programs so that police, if needed, could spy on conversations if they got the necessary legal approvals.

Until now, C-30 has remained shelved by Parliament, and has not been debated after receiving mass criticism when it was originally released.

Critics claimed that the authorities would likely use the powers to harass peaceful protestors and activists.

A number of social media protests were organized, one of which circulated personal details from the divorce files of the bill’s sponsor of the bill-Public Safety Minister’s Vic Toews.

People also marched on the streets, demanding checks to the would-be unlimited police powers.

A public opinion poll conducted by Angus Reid after the bill’s introduction concluded that "the idea of surrendering subscriber data and identifiers without a warrant” is rejected by almost two thirds of Canadians.

 

Sunday, October 21, 2012

UK press regulation risks democracy


 
Source: Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/10/21/267906/uk-press-regulation-risks-democracy/

A Scottish cabinet secretary warns that the statutory regulation of the press as expected to be announced by a government inquiry into the ethics of the British media could damage democracy.

Scottish Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth John Swinney said the government interference in the activities of the press could breach the values Britain claims to represent.

“My personal opinion is that I don’t favor statutory regulation of the press. I don’t think it’s a good thing. I don’t think it sits comfortably with a civilized, modern, Western democracy,” Swinney told the Scottish National Party Conference.

His comment comes ahead of a report by Lord Justice Leveson, who is leading a public inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of British press following the News International phone hacking scandal.

Leveson, who was appointed as the chairman of the inquiry by UK Prime Minister David Cameron, said back in November 2011 that his investigations aim to answer whether the press that “provides an essential check on all aspects of public life” need a guardian and if so who should do the job.

The inquiry’s report is to emerge next month and is expected to propose tougher controls on the press.

Swinney has not been the first politician censuring the inquiry amid criticisms, including by former chairman of the Press Complaints Commission Sir Christopher Meyer, that the probe is no more than a “show trial” to justify further government control over the media.

Cameron’s Education Secretary Michael Gove also raised fears in February that the inquiry is having a “chilling” effect on free speech.

“The big picture is that there is a chilling atmosphere towards freedom of expression which emanates from the debate around Leveson,” Gove said.

The accusations of the inquiry being a mock trial especially gained force after revelations that Leveson attended two parties over the past year at the London home of Matthew Freud who is married to daughter of News International’s big boss Rupert Murdoch.

This comes as the British government had earlier used student protests and anti-spending cuts rallies in London and other cities as an excuse to call for tougher controls on social networking websites, sparking outrage among civil rights campaigners.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

EU Censors Alternative News in Bid to Dominate US NATO War Narrative


Image: European Union is a Prison with no Free Speech
 
By: Tony Cartalucci
Source: Global Research
http://www.globalresearch.ca/eu-censors-alternative-news-in-bid-to-dominate-us-nato-war-narrative/5308461

Western media quietly attempts to censor growing global opposition, begins with Iranian media.

Iran’s Press TV reported in their article, “Press TV viewers slam EU move to ban Iran channels as illegal, hypocritical,” that “Press TV viewers have condemned as illegal and hypocritical the ban imposed by the European officials on the broadcast of several Iranian satellite channels.” Nearly no mention is made in the Western media regarding the blatant act of censorship – an act that runs contra to all perceived notions of “Western values,” and an act that directly undermines the narratives of the West supporting “freedom” and “democracy” around the globe

 
Image: The West has spent billions trying to leverage “freedom of speech” and “human rights” as a means to undermine, destabilize, overthrow, and replace governments around the world, from the US-engineered Eastern European “color-revolutions” after the fall of the Soviet Union, to the latest US-engineered “Arab Spring,” and all across Southeast Asia. Now with the West pursuing its own campaign of censorship, it is clear that these “values” were merely selectively and opportunistically manipulated.
….

The news has been buried under reports regarding a new round of sanctions passed by the EU which was recently awarded the Nobel Peace Prize even while pursuing multiple wars across the globe, including continuing operations in Libya, the subversion of Syria, and a decade long occupation of Afghanistan which sees weekly civilian massacres by NATO air strikes on both sides of the Afghan-Pakistani border. In fact, the most recent NATO atrocity occurred not even a week ago, killing 3 children in the Helmand province. Of course this was absent in Western headlines, but it did make headlines in Iran’s Press TV, and indicates a more realistic explanation to the EU’s decision to ban the Iranian news service.

Clearly the EU has no qualms over endangering civilian lives – its concerns over “human rights” are a selectively applied value it uses against its enemies with demonstrably no intention of holding itself to similar standards. Now, the EU has applied this same selective application of supposed “Western values” to “freedom of speech,” curtailing it when that speech endangers its own interests, and pursuing “freedom” when it advances their agenda. And it is this hypocrisy that the increasingly popular Press TV news service has been illustrating, as a counterweight to the uniformly biased and compromised Western press.

It was US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who stated that censorship incurred “long-term economic and social costs,” with oppression leading to “civil unrest and not security.” Many Western politicians executing corporate-financier driven policyhave stated that a regime’s pursuit of censorship was a sign of weakness and fear – an indicator that its opposition was gaining ground and that more overt, visible, even desperate measures needed to be implemented. Censorship, according to the West’s own narrative, is part of a self-defeating cycle where legitimacy and the mandate to lead increasingly is fading.

With that consideration in mind, the censorship of Iran’s Press TV should be a sign that Iran’s efforts to balance global public perception skewed by the vast resources of Wall Street and London are succeeding. Along with Russia Today (RT), Press TV has provided nations who aspire to live in a mulipolar world where the primacy of the nation-state prevails, a model to follow in combating the unwarranted power and influence of Western media houses.

Above all, it should be noted that a key contributing factor to Press TV and RT’s success is the growing alternative media – media by the people and for the people – whose legitimacy and reputation is measured in accuracy, consistency, and objectivity, not slick graphics, expensive suits, and million-dollar studios. The alternative media has provided content for growing national news agencies seeking to challenge the West’s hegemony over information, and while national news agencies ultimately pursue national agendas, the content they are drawing on generally come from people simply seeking the truth.

The EU’s act of censorship against Press TV is in turn a strike against the alternative media. Instead of being seen as a setback, it should be seen as a success and a signal to redouble our efforts as individuals to assert our own will and vision for the future over that of the miniscule global elite who have so far gone unchallenged in their designs and aspirations. The alternative media should be only the first in a series of people-driven alternativessystematically undermining and replacing existing corporate-financier dominated paradigms.

Ways to watch Press TV in Europe
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/10/18/267357/how-to-watch-press-tv-in-europe/

You can find more by Tony Cartalucci here:
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ca/

NOTE:

Press TV is a voice that speaks for billions of people and should be allowed to express the views of others on air or we descend into another dark period when freedom of speech was not allowed in Europe.

Please sign the petition to maintain freedom of speech in Europe
http://www.change.org/petitions/press-tv-viewers-save-press-tv-in-europe